On-model photos from the flat shots you already have.

That's the entire job, and it's why a human QA step sits between the AI and you. Every image is checked against your real product — print placement, seams, colour, drape, hardware. Images that flatter the garment by changing it get rejected before you ever see them.

The flat shots or ghost-mannequin photos you already have — front and back, decent light, any phone camera at product quality works. If your current shots aren't usable we'll tell you exactly what to reshoot before quoting, not after.

Yes — that's one of the biggest advantages. Your whole catalog can share consistent model looks, poses and lighting, so the grid finally looks like one brand. You choose the model direction (age, style, setting) at the start and it holds across every SKU.

Policies differ by platform and they change — some require AI-generated imagery to be disclosed or restrict it for certain categories. We track the current rules, deliver images that comply for the channels you name, and tell you plainly where a label or a real photo is required.

The models are synthetic — not generated from any real person's likeness without consent, ever. No scraped faces, no celebrity look-alikes. You get documented usage rights to every delivered image.

For brand campaigns and hero imagery — probably yes, and we'll say so. AI on-model photography wins where shoots break down: catalog scale, restocks, colourway variants and speed. Most brands end up with both, each doing what it's best at.